Several Methods Of Determining Efficiency Standard By Inventory

< p > < strong > 1, < a href= > //www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > stability > /a > /strong > /p >

< p > standards should be applied in different ranges and conditions, and they can be maintained for a long time.

Because if the standards are constantly changing and changing rapidly, managers will be at a loss as to what to do and how many tasks they should set for management objects, which is consistent with the principle of efficiency.

Without stable standards, it is not conducive to the management of managers. Efficiency management will lose its scientificity and feasibility.

< /p >

< p > strong > two, < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > clarity < /a > /strong > /p >

< p > the standard of efficiency should be measurable. Standard values, units and allowable deviations should be clear and easy to understand and execute.

Because if the standard of efficiency can not be measured, it is impossible to evaluate the effect according to the standard. There is no measure or completely incapable of measurement. It should not and can not be the standard of efficiency.

Of course, because the efficiency standard involves all aspects of the relationship, it is not only decided by a unilateral factor, but will be affected by many factors such as environmental change and personnel flow. Therefore, the measurement of efficiency standards will not be as straight and feasible as the length and weight of measurement, but rather a complex task. It often requires the necessary pformation to measure, and its accuracy is not as accurate as length and weight.

< /p >

< p > strong > three, < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > participation < /a > /strong > /p >

< p > the standard is to improve work efficiency, so the standard is often directly related to the specific business work, and the senior managers generally do not directly participate in the specific business work, and there is no time to understand the specific business work. Therefore, when making standards, we should encourage subordinates to participate in the discussion and determination of the standards, and try to avoid making all the standards by the higher level managers, and then simply issuing and executing them.

< /p >

< p > in addition, the development of standards may require special skills, so staff members are often used in the setting of efficiency standards.

For example, the industrial engineer is responsible for formulating product standards through time study and action research. The product engineer is responsible for drawing up the quality standard, while the cost accountant is responsible for formulating the cost standard for the product and process.

< /p >

< p > < strong > four, critical control point < /strong > < /p >

< p > for a simple business operation, managers can manage through their own careful observation of the work done.

However, business activities are generally extremely complex. Therefore, in most business activities, managers are usually unable to notice everything. Managers must select key control points that need special attention, and measure performance at these points, so that managers can not know how things are going to be carried out at every step when implementing the plan, so as to ensure that the whole business activities are carried out as planned.

< /p >

< p > the choice of control points, every goal, every goal, every business activity, every guideline, every procedure or budget can be taken as the standard of management, and can be used as a control point.

Critical control points are the key factors for evaluating performance according to various plans.

Such as profitability, productivity, market share, product cost, etc.

With such standards, supervisors can manage a large number of subordinates in a leisurely manner, thereby expanding the management scope, achieving cost savings and improving the results of information communication.

< /p >