Analysis Of Misunderstanding In Chinese Enterprise Management

During this period, I saw many friends in a management group talking about an old topic: if you are a manager of a department, you have a very good performance now, but the old staff who often do not keep discipline will always regard your management system as nothing. What do you do?

The decision of most friends is one word: kill!

Seeing this vast majority of "killing" decisions, I think that some companies are losing heart for the pride of a lion, and I feel very heartache -- is this the so-called management?

Is this what we want to manage?

I think it should not be that we have fallen into the misunderstanding of management and far away from the essence of management.

One of the misunderstandings of small and medium-sized enterprises: small businesses with big management, if you want to make an enterprise bigger and stronger, then you go to do standardized management, because management can plug a lot of loopholes for you; if you want to destroy an enterprise, you will also do standardized management, because management itself is enough to drag you to the edge of life and death -- Excerpt from Liu Xiaoming's management motto.

Many owners of small and medium-sized enterprises are thinking that if their own businesses are as standard as those big businesses, the employees will be well behaved, energetic and behave more courteously than those on TV.

So many people bought a lot of management methods of Harvard University and the top five hundred enterprises in the world to learn and use them in their own businesses. But after several months of regulation, they found that although management was very impressive, the operation of the company was not fast enough.

Why can't the management of big enterprises drag the wheels of small businesses?

Firstly, the efficiency is greatly reduced, and the relationship between guests and customers is getting more and more troublesome.

The management has been perfected, and the procedures have been more numerous. Before the one or two people signed a sentence, they could get things done now and then. They had to toss back and forth several times before they could finish.

Large enterprises have strong influence or control ability on channels and consumers because of brand effect. Customers can not only accept the temptation of stable interests, but also have many rules and regulations. At the same time, the customers of large enterprises are basically large and powerful, and they are also willing to standardize management.

But small customers are not accustomed to the "barrier" rules and regulations. Now that management is perfect, their complaints are naturally more. How many standardized customers are there for small businesses?

Second, management has not managed the cost of management, but it has cost a lot of personnel image packaging, training fees and office environment improvement. But in addition to a slight change in the image of employees, the quality and ability of employees are still not improving in essence.

Immediately after that, the problem of human resources is increasing. Because the management must be standardized, the system is sure to be more, and the density of employees being punished is greater. The main reason is that the regular army of large enterprises make reference to them, so that the guerrilla style of their employees is becoming more and more disagreeable. Therefore, the company's grievances are getting bigger and bigger, and some employees can not afford to take the initiative to leave. Some employees are passive because they can not keep pace with the footsteps required by the company.

It is important for the people to go away. The important thing is the loss of staff and the continuous decline of sales volume. What is more important is the ability to recruit, but the mediocre people can not immediately take over the company's business. Finally, the company's operations are beginning to get into trouble. Because the premise of effective management is not the improvement of the system but the improvement of the treatment of employees. The relative high income allows employees to accept many pressure and helplessness which they did not want to bear. The secret of management is that many small business owners do not see from the management of large enterprises. They want to ask employees for eight hundred yuan wages to regulate employees like two thousand or three thousand yuan employees. How long do you think it will last?

Misunderstanding two: people "tube" live, the matter has been settled well, the sun Information newspaper has seen such a test question: "A" company: eight points to work, punch card system, late for one minute to deduct 50 yuan; uniform dress, you must bring a badge; every year for a tour, two meetings, three gatherings, four games, each employee should make 4 rationalization proposals every year.

B company: nine to work, no attendance.

Each office, each office can be arranged according to personal interests; corridor white walls, graffiti will not be stopped; drinks and fruits free open supply; working time can go to haircut, swimming.

C: whenever you want to come, you can wear whatever you like and bring your dog and children to your office.

Which company do you think is more promising for the three companies?

It is believed that most people will think that the first company will have a better prospect, because they are well regulated, systematic and relaxed, and should develop best than those two "irregular" companies.

But the fact is surprising: A Guangdong Nintaus Electronics Co., Ltd.

It was established in 1997 and filed for bankruptcy in July 2005 because of poor management. The period of existence is 9 years.

B: Microsoft Corp.

Founded in 1975, it is the largest software company in the world and the most valuable business in the United States.

C company: Google company.

Founded in 1998 by two students from Stanford University, it is said that the share price is now $more than 400, which is 3 times the number of Listed Companies in the year. It is the only company that can take talent from the Microsoft Empire beyond Warner, the global media giant era, and Coca-Cola.

The original author is from the angle of freedom and wealth, but the author wants to say that the company that manages the rules and regulations is only 9 years old, but on the surface, the company that manages the liberalisation work has achieved a great cause. What is the difference between them?

The difference between them is not the severity of management. Its essence lies in the different entry points of management.

Chinese management habits aim at "controlling people", so long as employees are kept at the company in a regular manner, the management tasks are completed.

Because we are most afraid of employees who do not work hard or get into trouble, in order to prevent this, we use some systems that can see employees working hard or not to prove everything. What kind of role do employees play after "hard work"?

The management of the other two companies focuses on "good things". The company does not need to see you doing things properly. The company only needs to see that you have done the job well, only depends on the achievement of the phased goals. As for how to make use of time in the process of doing things, it is not within the scope of the management's consideration.

In order to achieve the purpose of management, of course, it will be embodied in the visible form of expression. Therefore, the management based on "management of people" will strengthen the management of behavioral norms instead of the skills management and mindset management of employees, emphasizing the management of working hours rather than the management of job performance.

He has to emphasize the good working conditions and skills of the employees. He must emphasize the completion of the phased goals. It is not that the iron bars may be rusted needles, but the rods can only be made into toothpicks. The materials are not the same, and the effect of doing things will not be the same.

Therefore, if we want to do good things, we must find the right people. When employees' work skills and work attitude are all up to a certain level, things will be done well. Everything is done for you. There are less rules in other aspects.